<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 12 Confidential (Week 7)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-490</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Dex. I can&#039;t see how Nebraska gets in to the tournament. The only way would be via an undefeated finish to the season and two tournament wins, or winning the Big 12 title. I&#039;m not the negative type, but I have a hard time seeing them doing either of those. They should be happy to grab an NIT berth after a horrid start to the conference season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Dex. I can&#8217;t see how Nebraska gets in to the tournament. The only way would be via an undefeated finish to the season and two tournament wins, or winning the Big 12 title. I&#8217;m not the negative type, but I have a hard time seeing them doing either of those. They should be happy to grab an NIT berth after a horrid start to the conference season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dex</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Nebraska is definitely not in very good shape.  A lot has to happen for them to have a good shot at an atlarge.  For one, they need to win both games vs. Oklahoma and at OSU, and that won&#039;t happen.  They&#039;d be lucky to get one of those.  The only remaining game that the Huskers will win is vs. Colorado, who&#039;s already beaten them once.  There are several more deserving teams on the bubble and the teams towards the bottom of the Pac 10 and Big East will push Nebraska right off the bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nebraska is definitely not in very good shape.  A lot has to happen for them to have a good shot at an atlarge.  For one, they need to win both games vs. Oklahoma and at OSU, and that won&#8217;t happen.  They&#8217;d be lucky to get one of those.  The only remaining game that the Huskers will win is vs. Colorado, who&#8217;s already beaten them once.  There are several more deserving teams on the bubble and the teams towards the bottom of the Pac 10 and Big East will push Nebraska right off the bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Sam, let&#039;s assume Nebraska wins out except for Texas.  At 8-8 in conference play, that might be good enough this year, because the Bubble is so weak.  But at this point, I can&#039;t put them in at two games under .500.  Both games this week are HUGE.  OU is a Tournament-caliber team and would make three victims in a row.   And the Cowboys are hot and SO tough to beat in Stillwater.  Nebraska could go from the ninth team out this week, to a 10 seed next week if they win both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, let&#8217;s assume Nebraska wins out except for Texas.  At 8-8 in conference play, that might be good enough this year, because the Bubble is so weak.  But at this point, I can&#8217;t put them in at two games under .500.  Both games this week are HUGE.  OU is a Tournament-caliber team and would make three victims in a row.   And the Cowboys are hot and SO tough to beat in Stillwater.  Nebraska could go from the ninth team out this week, to a 10 seed next week if they win both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>@ Sam. I think Nebraska is in very good shape. They need to do what you said because at 8-8 makes them on the right side of the bubble. Remember what I call the &#039;&#039;X-Factor&#039;&#039;: Teams from one-bid conferences that get upset in their conference tournaments. The three best examples are Butler, South Alabama and Stephen F. Austin. If any of those teams should fall they probably will make it in. Butler is a lock, South Alabama is in good shape and Stephen F. Austin could finish 27-4 even with a loss in the Southland final. My advice for Nebraska is finish 9-7 or 8-8 and win at least one game in the Big 12 Tournament to feel safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sam. I think Nebraska is in very good shape. They need to do what you said because at 8-8 makes them on the right side of the bubble. Remember what I call the &#8221;X-Factor&#8221;: Teams from one-bid conferences that get upset in their conference tournaments. The three best examples are Butler, South Alabama and Stephen F. Austin. If any of those teams should fall they probably will make it in. Butler is a lock, South Alabama is in good shape and Stephen F. Austin could finish 27-4 even with a loss in the Southland final. My advice for Nebraska is finish 9-7 or 8-8 and win at least one game in the Big 12 Tournament to feel safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>It appears Nebraska is creeping into the bracket picture as well.  They did lose at Colorado and Iowa State, but have no other bad losses.  They beat Oregon and Arizona State in the early season, and now won games vs. Kansas State and at Texas A&amp;M.  If they win their remaining easy games against Oklahoma State and Colorado, and beat wither Oklahoma or Texas, they&#039;ll be 8-8 in conference play and several good wins which I think should earn them a bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears Nebraska is creeping into the bracket picture as well.  They did lose at Colorado and Iowa State, but have no other bad losses.  They beat Oregon and Arizona State in the early season, and now won games vs. Kansas State and at Texas A&amp;M.  If they win their remaining easy games against Oklahoma State and Colorado, and beat wither Oklahoma or Texas, they&#8217;ll be 8-8 in conference play and several good wins which I think should earn them a bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/features/big-12-confidential-week-7/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>KU lost today to Oklahoma State.  Texas beat Oklahoma State in Stillwater earlier in the year.  They also beat KU.

KU is now two games behind Texas (thanks to the tie-breaker) and looking like they won&#039;t catch Texas.

I tried to tell you KU was overrated and not as good as Texas  :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KU lost today to Oklahoma State.  Texas beat Oklahoma State in Stillwater earlier in the year.  They also beat KU.</p>
<p>KU is now two games behind Texas (thanks to the tie-breaker) and looking like they won&#8217;t catch Texas.</p>
<p>I tried to tell you KU was overrated and not as good as Texas  <img src='http://www.bracketography.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
