<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Pac-10 REALLY the Nation&#8217;s Top Conference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/</link>
	<description>NCAA Tournament Predictions and Projections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>since when was Arizona State a lock for an NCAA tourny birth? 

if i remember correctly they were finished to place 9th in the pac 10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since when was Arizona State a lock for an NCAA tourny birth? </p>
<p>if i remember correctly they were finished to place 9th in the pac 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>@Patrick - Your point about many of the top teams losing early is well-taken.   However, I think the Pac-10&#039;s RPI will take a hit with the likely sub-200 losses to Mercer and Siena in particular.  

@&quot;lute&quot; - Injuries only mean so much...even without Daniel Hackett, it&#039;s safe to say that the Committee would expect USC to win a game at the Galen Center against an opponent the caliber of Mercer.  As for Brook Lopez, a few rumors floating around here in the Bay Area speculate he may not be back as quickly as expected...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick &#8211; Your point about many of the top teams losing early is well-taken.   However, I think the Pac-10&#8242;s RPI will take a hit with the likely sub-200 losses to Mercer and Siena in particular.  </p>
<p>@&#8221;lute&#8221; &#8211; Injuries only mean so much&#8230;even without Daniel Hackett, it&#8217;s safe to say that the Committee would expect USC to win a game at the Galen Center against an opponent the caliber of Mercer.  As for Brook Lopez, a few rumors floating around here in the Bay Area speculate he may not be back as quickly as expected&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lute</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>lute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>nevermind i stand corrected.. but asu was the last team to play a game when they opened up vs illinois, they needed to schedule a game. they looked pretty good vs LSU

USC was without Daniel Hackett vs mercer...

Stanford without Lopez.. etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nevermind i stand corrected.. but asu was the last team to play a game when they opened up vs illinois, they needed to schedule a game. they looked pretty good vs LSU</p>
<p>USC was without Daniel Hackett vs mercer&#8230;</p>
<p>Stanford without Lopez.. etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lute</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>lute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>you lost me when you said arizona state was a lock for a tourney spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you lost me when you said arizona state was a lock for a tourney spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/is-the-pac-10-really-the-nations-top-conference/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Whatever...  all the big schools lose early in the season or have close calls.  Factor in new players, new system, injuries, etc.

No one&#039;s been untouched.  Ohio State lost.  Louisville lost.  North Carolina had multiple close calls. etc. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever&#8230;  all the big schools lose early in the season or have close calls.  Factor in new players, new system, injuries, etc.</p>
<p>No one&#8217;s been untouched.  Ohio State lost.  Louisville lost.  North Carolina had multiple close calls. etc. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

