<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kentucky Creeps Into the Bracket Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/</link>
	<description>NCAA Tournament Predictions and Projections</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>Cats are in against a less than stellar Marquette team. Get over it. Can't wait till Billie gets the train rolling and the Cats are back at the #1 position, as so many of our faithful fans are used too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cats are in against a less than stellar Marquette team. Get over it. Can&#8217;t wait till Billie gets the train rolling and the Cats are back at the #1 position, as so many of our faithful fans are used too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>AS I stated EMPHATICALLY several times. Kentucky is in BABY!!!!!!!! How do you like that Kentucky HATAS. Hope Tubby enjoys the NIT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS I stated EMPHATICALLY several times. Kentucky is in BABY!!!!!!!! How do you like that Kentucky HATAS. Hope Tubby enjoys the NIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>Georgia has somehow conspired with God, so they don't have to play the Wildcats. They hope that Kentucky will just pack up and go home. In response to  Tennessee ATO saying that Kentucky should "EASILY" defeat Georgia. Is that as "EASY" as Tennessee beating South Carolina? Watch your overconfident rear end my friend, it might just come back to haunt you. Regardless, Kentucky is in the NCAA tourney no matter what they do against Georgia, no matter when the game is played. Anybody that thinks otherwise is living in a dream world or doesn't know what they are talking about or both. Kentucky haters had better get us when we are a little down, because it wil be Hell to pay when Billy Clyde gets the Kentucky juggernaut going again and gets rid of the Tubby hangover. Bank on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgia has somehow conspired with God, so they don&#8217;t have to play the Wildcats. They hope that Kentucky will just pack up and go home. In response to  Tennessee ATO saying that Kentucky should &#8220;EASILY&#8221; defeat Georgia. Is that as &#8220;EASY&#8221; as Tennessee beating South Carolina? Watch your overconfident rear end my friend, it might just come back to haunt you. Regardless, Kentucky is in the NCAA tourney no matter what they do against Georgia, no matter when the game is played. Anybody that thinks otherwise is living in a dream world or doesn&#8217;t know what they are talking about or both. Kentucky haters had better get us when we are a little down, because it wil be Hell to pay when Billy Clyde gets the Kentucky juggernaut going again and gets rid of the Tubby hangover. Bank on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennessee ATO</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennessee ATO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>UK's resume isn't as wonderful as many make it out to be, IMHO.  The home wins over UK and Vandy were clearly "very good" wins.  The stuff UK has going against it is the 4-7 record away from the friendly confines and the 5-10 record against the RPI top 100.  And the 2 horrible early-season losses are hanging around UK's neck like an albatross.

I think UK needs to dispatch UGA today (should be easy) to have any kind of a shot.  The Ole Miss and UAB losses certainly helped UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK&#8217;s resume isn&#8217;t as wonderful as many make it out to be, IMHO.  The home wins over UK and Vandy were clearly &#8220;very good&#8221; wins.  The stuff UK has going against it is the 4-7 record away from the friendly confines and the 5-10 record against the RPI top 100.  And the 2 horrible early-season losses are hanging around UK&#8217;s neck like an albatross.</p>
<p>I think UK needs to dispatch UGA today (should be easy) to have any kind of a shot.  The Ole Miss and UAB losses certainly helped UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Billy won SEC coach of the year as well Gail. How do you think he won that? By winning against bad teams? No, he beat the powerhouse of Tennessee and the 2 time defending National Champs. Are you even a Kentucky fan? If you are, you should become more informed. Even just reading www.ukathletics.com will keep you informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy won SEC coach of the year as well Gail. How do you think he won that? By winning against bad teams? No, he beat the powerhouse of Tennessee and the 2 time defending National Champs. Are you even a Kentucky fan? If you are, you should become more informed. Even just reading <a href="http://www.ukathletics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ukathletics.com</a> will keep you informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>Kentucky is a lock for the tourney even if they lose by 100 to Georgia. Most brackets have them as an 8th or 9th seed. Any "concerned " fan such as Gail that makes ridiculous unsubstantiated statements about a phantom ESPN spokeperson saying that Kentucky has wins "only against teams that records weren’t the best and these teams are at the bottom of their conference"(Her Quote). How uninformed does that sound?

 How can you have a 12-4 record in a conference "ONLY" against teams with bad records? In fact, the only team with a winning record that Kentucky did NOT beat was Mississippi State. But they did beat Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Arkansas and Florida. 

 So THOSE are the facts and all of you Kentucky haters need to look forward to the Cats making the tourney again in spite of TUBBY running the greatest basketball program in the country, with the most wins in history, into the ground for the last 10 years with his lackluster recruiting and his unispired philosophy on offense which was the reason he couldn't recruit with the top programs in the 1st place! If TUBBY was still at Kentucky they would be lucky to win 12 games for the WHOLE SEASON!

 I am not making any stupid predictions about how they will do in either the SEC tourney or the the NCAA tourney but they will play in BOTH and they will play hard and with HEART even without Patrick Patterson. And Billy Clyde will have them ready for next year and beyond where he will restore UK back to the level that Rick Pitino left it for Tubby. That being a realistic chance of a National Championship in most years. Not just a pipe dream. And definitely more than 1 final four in 10 years. From an "INFORMED" fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky is a lock for the tourney even if they lose by 100 to Georgia. Most brackets have them as an 8th or 9th seed. Any &#8220;concerned &#8221; fan such as Gail that makes ridiculous unsubstantiated statements about a phantom ESPN spokeperson saying that Kentucky has wins &#8220;only against teams that records weren’t the best and these teams are at the bottom of their conference&#8221;(Her Quote). How uninformed does that sound?</p>
<p> How can you have a 12-4 record in a conference &#8220;ONLY&#8221; against teams with bad records? In fact, the only team with a winning record that Kentucky did NOT beat was Mississippi State. But they did beat Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Arkansas and Florida. </p>
<p> So THOSE are the facts and all of you Kentucky haters need to look forward to the Cats making the tourney again in spite of TUBBY running the greatest basketball program in the country, with the most wins in history, into the ground for the last 10 years with his lackluster recruiting and his unispired philosophy on offense which was the reason he couldn&#8217;t recruit with the top programs in the 1st place! If TUBBY was still at Kentucky they would be lucky to win 12 games for the WHOLE SEASON!</p>
<p> I am not making any stupid predictions about how they will do in either the SEC tourney or the the NCAA tourney but they will play in BOTH and they will play hard and with HEART even without Patrick Patterson. And Billy Clyde will have them ready for next year and beyond where he will restore UK back to the level that Rick Pitino left it for Tubby. That being a realistic chance of a National Championship in most years. Not just a pipe dream. And definitely more than 1 final four in 10 years. From an &#8220;INFORMED&#8221; fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>@Brian and Gail - 

Brian, I edited your comment; please avoid personal comments and keep things courteous.

I think UK does have enough quality wins; as I said on ESPN Radio Louisville today, the issue is that none of them are away from Rupp, which makes winning a game in the SEC Tournament on a neutral floor more important than it might otherwise be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian and Gail - </p>
<p>Brian, I edited your comment; please avoid personal comments and keep things courteous.</p>
<p>I think UK does have enough quality wins; as I said on ESPN Radio Louisville today, the issue is that none of them are away from Rupp, which makes winning a game in the SEC Tournament on a neutral floor more important than it might otherwise be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>gail you make no sense at all. With wins over Florida Tennessee and Vanderbilt how can we not have good wins. Going 12-4 in the SEC is pretty good for any team. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gail you make no sense at all. With wins over Florida Tennessee and Vanderbilt how can we not have good wins. Going 12-4 in the SEC is pretty good for any team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Go 12-4 in the SEC.... you're in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go 12-4 in the SEC&#8230;. you&#8217;re in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gail stone</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>gail stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/kentucky-creeps-into-the-bracket-discussion/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>I'm not real sure how some things play out,but there are other teams with records
like kentucky that are not even being considered. one arguement from an espn 
spokesperson mentioned that kentucky's wins were only against teams that records weren't the best and these teams are at the bottom of their conference.
so these really aren't key wins. 
from a concerned fan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not real sure how some things play out,but there are other teams with records<br />
like kentucky that are not even being considered. one arguement from an espn<br />
spokesperson mentioned that kentucky&#8217;s wins were only against teams that records weren&#8217;t the best and these teams are at the bottom of their conference.<br />
so these really aren&#8217;t key wins.<br />
from a concerned fan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
