<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Bracket Buster Recap: Utah State 72, UC Santa Barbara 59</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/</link>
	<description>NCAA Tournament Predictions and Projections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>@ John K. I agree with you. I do not think Southern Illinois should get an at-large bid, but the committee is impressed with their non-conference schedule(Indiana, vs USC, Saint Louis, Butler, Nevada, Saint Mary&#039;s), but David Mihm&#039;s job is to project what he thinks what the commitee will do, not always the fairness on the commitee&#039;s part. And if anyone tries to tell they don&#039;t take into account the past history of a team like SIU, that&#039;s wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ John K. I agree with you. I do not think Southern Illinois should get an at-large bid, but the committee is impressed with their non-conference schedule(Indiana, vs USC, Saint Louis, Butler, Nevada, Saint Mary&#8217;s), but David Mihm&#8217;s job is to project what he thinks what the commitee will do, not always the fairness on the commitee&#8217;s part. And if anyone tries to tell they don&#8217;t take into account the past history of a team like SIU, that&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>Also..

I think the committee would try it&#039;s darndest to avoid a Kent State, Xavier matchup in the second round since they already played this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also..</p>
<p>I think the committee would try it&#8217;s darndest to avoid a Kent State, Xavier matchup in the second round since they already played this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>No UAB, no Florida and no Virginia Tech? Florida is fine with me over Kentucy (we&#039;re splitting hairs until they meet. But Va Tech -- 17-11 overall, 8-6 in the ACC? Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No UAB, no Florida and no Virginia Tech? Florida is fine with me over Kentucy (we&#8217;re splitting hairs until they meet. But Va Tech &#8212; 17-11 overall, 8-6 in the ACC? Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K.</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>John K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>Southern Ill. gets an at-large? How????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Southern Ill. gets an at-large? How????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t matter what we say about Kentucky. If Florida beats them(and I have all the confidence in the world we will) then Kentucky will be out. There is no possible way for the commitee to take Kentucky over Florida if we sweep them.

@ John K. The MVC gets 3 teams because all the other bubble teams choked, so it basically fell into the Valley&#039;s lap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t matter what we say about Kentucky. If Florida beats them(and I have all the confidence in the world we will) then Kentucky will be out. There is no possible way for the commitee to take Kentucky over Florida if we sweep them.</p>
<p>@ John K. The MVC gets 3 teams because all the other bubble teams choked, so it basically fell into the Valley&#8217;s lap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>@ Larry

I&#039;m sure glad that you are not on the Selection Committee.  

You move Kentucky up and you move Arizona down and they both lost.

Arizona has 10 wins vs. top 100 RPI
Kentucky has 4 wins vs. top 100 RPI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Larry</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure glad that you are not on the Selection Committee.  </p>
<p>You move Kentucky up and you move Arizona down and they both lost.</p>
<p>Arizona has 10 wins vs. top 100 RPI<br />
Kentucky has 4 wins vs. top 100 RPI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K.</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>John K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>How does the MVC get three bids if the season ended today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the MVC get three bids if the season ended today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>For the most part I agree with this Bracket. 

I would drop St. Joseph&#039;s and Arizona due to their HOME losses today.

I would add Western Kentucky and UAB.

Adjustments:
Moving up!
Clemson, Wash St., Purdue, Baylor, Pitt, South Alabama, Kentucky

Moving Down:
Indiana, K-State, Gonzaga, Ariz State, St. Mary&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I agree with this Bracket. </p>
<p>I would drop St. Joseph&#8217;s and Arizona due to their HOME losses today.</p>
<p>I would add Western Kentucky and UAB.</p>
<p>Adjustments:<br />
Moving up!<br />
Clemson, Wash St., Purdue, Baylor, Pitt, South Alabama, Kentucky</p>
<p>Moving Down:<br />
Indiana, K-State, Gonzaga, Ariz State, St. Mary&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/bracket-buster/2008-bracket-buster-utah-state-72-uc-santa-barbara-59/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Thats crazy son!! I couldnt believe, so Im checking on tourny articles and there you were! BOOM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats crazy son!! I couldnt believe, so Im checking on tourny articles and there you were! BOOM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

