<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bracketography.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 NCAA Bracket Predictions: Bloody Sunday For The SEC? by Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/2013-ncaa-bracket-predictions-bloody-sunday-for-sec/#comment-179936</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1703#comment-179936</guid>
		<description>Looks like I nailed everything except Memphis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I nailed everything except Memphis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Kentucky Safe For Now by Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-kentucky-safe-for-now/#comment-178195</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1691#comment-178195</guid>
		<description>CBS link 
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/41007829/0/0/41008029#ID41008029</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS link<br />
<a href="http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/41007829/0/0/41008029#ID41008029" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/41007829/0/0/41008029#ID41008029</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Kentucky Safe For Now by Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-kentucky-safe-for-now/#comment-178194</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1691#comment-178194</guid>
		<description>I got all 68 taems correct for the 1st time ever I posted on CBS site at 6 PM my true seeds 1-68

Let&#039;s see how I did with the stuff I said I disagreed with you on. 

Saint Mary&#039;s barely made the field was the 3rd to last team in (exactly where I had them I had the last 4 in correct and in the same true seed order as the committe)  I knew they were never a 8 or 7 seed.

Memphis I give you credit you and the committee had them way higher then me (I had them at 8 seed) you win that one but only that one.

Butler I had as a 6 and they were a 6
Creighton I had as a 7 they were a 7
Southern Miss I said they were out and they were out
Cincy I had as a 9 they were a 10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got all 68 taems correct for the 1st time ever I posted on CBS site at 6 PM my true seeds 1-68</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see how I did with the stuff I said I disagreed with you on. </p>
<p>Saint Mary&#8217;s barely made the field was the 3rd to last team in (exactly where I had them I had the last 4 in correct and in the same true seed order as the committe)  I knew they were never a 8 or 7 seed.</p>
<p>Memphis I give you credit you and the committee had them way higher then me (I had them at 8 seed) you win that one but only that one.</p>
<p>Butler I had as a 6 and they were a 6<br />
Creighton I had as a 7 they were a 7<br />
Southern Miss I said they were out and they were out<br />
Cincy I had as a 9 they were a 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: James Madison Crashes The Party by Matt Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-james-madison-crashes-party/#comment-173716</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1677#comment-173716</guid>
		<description>You were spot on here, Keith. Everything should be good now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were spot on here, Keith. Everything should be good now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Kentucky Safe For Now by Matt Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-kentucky-safe-for-now/#comment-173712</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1691#comment-173712</guid>
		<description>We actually have St. Mary&#039;s as an 8-seed, but they had to be moved to a 7-seed to adhere to all of the committee&#039;s seeding rules. 74/77 brackets tracked by the bracket matrix have the Gaels in the tourney, so it would be a pretty big shock if they didn&#039;t make it (http://www.bracketmatrix.com/).

Same with Memphis by the way. The Tigers are on the 5-line instead of the 6 to keep teams from the same conference apart. 

Obviously reasonable minds can, and do, disagree about all of this. We&#039;ll see how things shake out on Selection Sunday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We actually have St. Mary&#8217;s as an 8-seed, but they had to be moved to a 7-seed to adhere to all of the committee&#8217;s seeding rules. 74/77 brackets tracked by the bracket matrix have the Gaels in the tourney, so it would be a pretty big shock if they didn&#8217;t make it (<a href="http://www.bracketmatrix.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bracketmatrix.com/</a>).</p>
<p>Same with Memphis by the way. The Tigers are on the 5-line instead of the 6 to keep teams from the same conference apart. </p>
<p>Obviously reasonable minds can, and do, disagree about all of this. We&#8217;ll see how things shake out on Selection Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Kentucky Safe For Now by Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-kentucky-safe-for-now/#comment-172092</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1691#comment-172092</guid>
		<description>Other seeds that seem off besides Saint Mary&#039;s which seems way off.

5 Memphis (How are they this high ?)
8 Butler (How are they this low ?)
9 Creighton (How are they this low ?)
12 Southern Miss (How are in the field ?)
12 Cincinnati (Seems low to me has them in a play in game)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other seeds that seem off besides Saint Mary&#8217;s which seems way off.</p>
<p>5 Memphis (How are they this high ?)<br />
8 Butler (How are they this low ?)<br />
9 Creighton (How are they this low ?)<br />
12 Southern Miss (How are in the field ?)<br />
12 Cincinnati (Seems low to me has them in a play in game)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Kentucky Safe For Now by Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-kentucky-safe-for-now/#comment-172081</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1691#comment-172081</guid>
		<description>How in the world can you have Saint Mary&#039;s as a 7 seed ?  They might not even make the tournament and you have them as a 7 seed ?  They have 1 count them 1 total win vs an NCAA tournament at large level team (Home vs Creighton) this is it.  They have 1 top 50 win.  The next best win is vs NIT at best team BYU.

They also have 2 losses to 101+ RPI (Pacific and Ga-Tech)

I am wondering if they will make the tournamnet at all and you have them as a 7 seed ?  That is insane...if they do make the tournament they will be no higher than a 10 or 11 seed and maybe in the First 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world can you have Saint Mary&#8217;s as a 7 seed ?  They might not even make the tournament and you have them as a 7 seed ?  They have 1 count them 1 total win vs an NCAA tournament at large level team (Home vs Creighton) this is it.  They have 1 top 50 win.  The next best win is vs NIT at best team BYU.</p>
<p>They also have 2 losses to 101+ RPI (Pacific and Ga-Tech)</p>
<p>I am wondering if they will make the tournamnet at all and you have them as a 7 seed ?  That is insane&#8230;if they do make the tournament they will be no higher than a 10 or 11 seed and maybe in the First 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: James Madison Crashes The Party by Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-james-madison-crashes-party/#comment-168646</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1677#comment-168646</guid>
		<description>Error: With less than 8 teams in, ACC teams should not meet until elite 8 by NCAA bracketing rules, but you have Miami and UNC in the same pod! Swap out UNC and Oklahoma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Error: With less than 8 teams in, ACC teams should not meet until elite 8 by NCAA bracketing rules, but you have Miami and UNC in the same pod! Swap out UNC and Oklahoma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NCAA Bracket Projections 2013: Indiana Now The Top Seed In Our 2013 Bracket by Matt Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-projections-2013-indiana-now-top-seed/#comment-158359</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1617#comment-158359</guid>
		<description>Jason,

First of all, sorry for the delay in response. We&#039;re certainly not alone on keeping Gonzaga off the 1-seed line here. In fact, 14 of the other 38 bracketologists tracked by the Bracket Project who published brackets yesterday did NOT have the Zags on the 1 line: 

http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>First of all, sorry for the delay in response. We&#8217;re certainly not alone on keeping Gonzaga off the 1-seed line here. In fact, 14 of the other 38 bracketologists tracked by the Bracket Project who published brackets yesterday did NOT have the Zags on the 1 line: </p>
<p><a href="http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm" rel="nofollow">http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 NCAA Bracket Predictions: Cal Back In The Mix by Matt Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/2013-ncaa-bracket-predictions-cal-back-in-the-mix/#comment-158349</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.teamrankings.com/bracketography/?p=1565#comment-158349</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the delay in response. In the most recent projections both Cal and Oregon are in the 8/9 range, and there&#039;s still time with the Pac-12 tourney for the Bears to jump ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delay in response. In the most recent projections both Cal and Oregon are in the 8/9 range, and there&#8217;s still time with the Pac-12 tourney for the Bears to jump ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
