Comments for NCAA Tournament Coverage from Bracketography http://www.bracketography.com NCAA Tournament Predictions and Projections Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:12:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3 Comment on North Carolina Tar Heels by anjelica leonard http://www.bracketography.com/teams/north-carolina-tar-heels/#comment-7726 anjelica leonard Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:24:02 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/teams/north-carolina-tar-heels/#comment-7726 I ABSOUTLY LOVE TYWON LAWSON!! I ABSOUTLY LOVE TYWON LAWSON!!

]]>
Comment on Bracketography’s “Best in State” Awards by Larry http://www.bracketography.com/features/best-in-state/#comment-2556 Larry Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:17:30 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/features/best-in-state/#comment-2556 Arbry Butler? Arbry Butler? You have gone off the reservation on this one. Hilarious. I am a Shocker fan and would love to have someone from the team on the list, but you have lost your mind with this pick. Arbry Butler? Arbry Butler? You have gone off the reservation on this one.

Hilarious. I am a Shocker fan and would love to have someone from the team on the list, but you have lost your mind with this pick.

]]>
Comment on How will the Big Ten fare in the NCAA Tournament? by Christopher Mackinder http://www.bracketography.com/features/how-will-the-big-ten-fare-in-the-ncaa-tournament/#comment-2327 Christopher Mackinder Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:04:25 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/features/how-will-the-big-ten-fare-in-the-ncaa-tournament/#comment-2327 Instead of writing a new article detailing the Big Ten's showing in the NCAA Tournament, I figured I could just post a few quick thoughts here: First, Indiana's first-round exit is pretty sad when you consider the Hoosiers were a Elite Eight team two months ago. A Eric Gordon-D.J. White combo should NEVER lose in the first round to an average-at-best Arkansas team. Obviously, the coaching situation played a major factor in Indiana's 3-4 finish down the stretch. Tom Crean (a former Michigan State assistant and the thought-to-be successor to Tom Izzo at Michigan State) will get the program back to elite status... in a few years. (If he did it at Marquette, he can do it in Indiana, a hoops hotbed. Purdue played extremely well and, had it beaten Xavier, would have reached the Elite Eight in my opinion. I'm a big fan of Purdue's freshman class and an even bigger fan of the way Chris Kramer plays basketball. He's got some offensive talent, but he's the conference's best defender not named Michael Flowers. I expect Purdue to be just as good if not better next season, though it will be tough to top a 15-3 Big Ten mark. Michigan State showed it can play when it wants to in reaching the Sweet 16. But, Memphis showed just how inconsistent the Spartans were this season with the Sweet 16 beatdown. This team had talent but the pieces just didn't mix very well. Toward the end of the season you saw how the team played when players other than Drew Neitzel took over a game (Goran Suton, Kalin Lucas...). With no Neitzel (or Drew Naymick) next season, the Spartans will be relying heavily on Lucas and Suton to be the inside-outside combination. That doesn't include incoming freshman Delvon Roe, who has been ranked anywhere from No. 6 to No. 14 in recuriting lists. Roe and Morgan, who hopes his sophomroe slump doesn't continue into his junior season, will be solid at the 3 and the 4 and MSU should have enough depth to play 9-10 deep daily. Wisconsin's loss to Davidson was the worst I have seen Wisconsin play in six years. I have seen the Badgers in person about 10 times in that span and Friday's loss to Davidson was absolutely awful. Yes, Davidson played extremely well, both offensively and defensively, but Wisconsin didn't help themselves. It didn't help matters that Trevon Hughes was injured. He's one of those "glue-guys" that when not on the floor, things definitely don't run as smoothly. All in all, the Big Ten went 5-4 in the NCAA Tournament which, based on seeds, is what "should" have happened. Purdue and Wisconsin played to their seed; Indiana played below its seed and Michigan State was the lone team to play above its seed. I fully expect the Big Ten's swoon to be in the past when next season rolls around. The early projections on who will lead the league (not my opinion but those of Big Ten media and coaches) is: 1-Michigan State; 2-Purdue; 3-Ohio State; 4-Wisconsin... That doesn't include Illinois, who undoubtedly will make some sort of a jump in the standings. Indiana will still be talented, but losing possibly the entire starting lineup won't bode well in 2008-09. Minnesota loses its senior leadership but I'm sure Tubby Smith will keep the Gophers around .500 in the Big Ten. Penn State should fall back toward the back of the pack with Northwestern. I expect Michigan to make strides, though how big I can't tell. Here is what Beilein did at West Virginia, the only comparable program to Michigan, in his first 3 seasons: 2002-03 West Virginia 14-15 5-11 2003-04 West Virginia 17-14 7-9 NIT 3rd Round 2004-05 West Virginia 24-11 8-8 NCAA Elite Eight He's coming off a miserable 10-21 season in Ann Arbor. I don't see the Wolverines making the NCAAs next season, but I do see Michigan approaching 17-19 wins and an NIT berth. Then, in year three, the Wolverines should be back in the Big Dance, somewhere in the 7-12 seed range as the Big Ten's 5th or 6th best team. Those are just some thoughts on the Big Ten's past and future. Instead of writing a new article detailing the Big Ten’s showing in the NCAA Tournament, I figured I could just post a few quick thoughts here:

First, Indiana’s first-round exit is pretty sad when you consider the Hoosiers were a Elite Eight team two months ago. A Eric Gordon-D.J. White combo should NEVER lose in the first round to an average-at-best Arkansas team. Obviously, the coaching situation played a major factor in Indiana’s 3-4 finish down the stretch. Tom Crean (a former Michigan State assistant and the thought-to-be successor to Tom Izzo at Michigan State) will get the program back to elite status… in a few years. (If he did it at Marquette, he can do it in Indiana, a hoops hotbed.

Purdue played extremely well and, had it beaten Xavier, would have reached the Elite Eight in my opinion. I’m a big fan of Purdue’s freshman class and an even bigger fan of the way Chris Kramer plays basketball. He’s got some offensive talent, but he’s the conference’s best defender not named Michael Flowers. I expect Purdue to be just as good if not better next season, though it will be tough to top a 15-3 Big Ten mark.

Michigan State showed it can play when it wants to in reaching the Sweet 16. But, Memphis showed just how inconsistent the Spartans were this season with the Sweet 16 beatdown. This team had talent but the pieces just didn’t mix very well. Toward the end of the season you saw how the team played when players other than Drew Neitzel took over a game (Goran Suton, Kalin Lucas…). With no Neitzel (or Drew Naymick) next season, the Spartans will be relying heavily on Lucas and Suton to be the inside-outside combination. That doesn’t include incoming freshman Delvon Roe, who has been ranked anywhere from No. 6 to No. 14 in recuriting lists. Roe and Morgan, who hopes his sophomroe slump doesn’t continue into his junior season, will be solid at the 3 and the 4 and MSU should have enough depth to play 9-10 deep daily.

Wisconsin’s loss to Davidson was the worst I have seen Wisconsin play in six years. I have seen the Badgers in person about 10 times in that span and Friday’s loss to Davidson was absolutely awful. Yes, Davidson played extremely well, both offensively and defensively, but Wisconsin didn’t help themselves. It didn’t help matters that Trevon Hughes was injured. He’s one of those “glue-guys” that when not on the floor, things definitely don’t run as smoothly.

All in all, the Big Ten went 5-4 in the NCAA Tournament which, based on seeds, is what “should” have happened. Purdue and Wisconsin played to their seed; Indiana played below its seed and Michigan State was the lone team to play above its seed.

I fully expect the Big Ten’s swoon to be in the past when next season rolls around. The early projections on who will lead the league (not my opinion but those of Big Ten media and coaches) is: 1-Michigan State; 2-Purdue; 3-Ohio State; 4-Wisconsin… That doesn’t include Illinois, who undoubtedly will make some sort of a jump in the standings. Indiana will still be talented, but losing possibly the entire starting lineup won’t bode well in 2008-09. Minnesota loses its senior leadership but I’m sure Tubby Smith will keep the Gophers around .500 in the Big Ten. Penn State should fall back toward the back of the pack with Northwestern. I expect Michigan to make strides, though how big I can’t tell.

Here is what Beilein did at West Virginia, the only comparable program to Michigan, in his first 3 seasons:

2002-03 West Virginia 14-15 5-11
2003-04 West Virginia 17-14 7-9 NIT 3rd Round
2004-05 West Virginia 24-11 8-8 NCAA Elite Eight

He’s coming off a miserable 10-21 season in Ann Arbor. I don’t see the Wolverines making the NCAAs next season, but I do see Michigan approaching 17-19 wins and an NIT berth. Then, in year three, the Wolverines should be back in the Big Dance, somewhere in the 7-12 seed range as the Big Ten’s 5th or 6th best team.

Those are just some thoughts on the Big Ten’s past and future.

]]>
Comment on “Sweet 16” Tips for Picking a Winning Bracket by Christopher Mackinder http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2326 Christopher Mackinder Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:59:17 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2326 For the record, this is the FIRST (and likely only year) that I saw picking all No. 1 seeds to reach the Final Four as a possibility. The combined record of that group, coupled with the fact the only non-No. 1 seed that I saw possibly reaching the Final Four was Tennessee made the choice easy (While I think Texas is a great team, I just didn't feel they were as good as advertised and therefore kept them from San Antonio). Luckily for myself, I nailed the Final Four in my pool and I'm just waiting to see if Kansas can win it all, which would net me 1st, regardless if the Jayhawks beats UCLA or Memphis. Of course, as David's No. 16 states, maybe I should have just asked my wife. If Memphis wins it all, she'll finish 2nd (out of 86)!!! @ Barbara: I had a third-round seat at the Regionals in Detroit and I can say from seeing Rush up close and talking to him after the Kansas-Davidson game, he is fine. The only reason he isn't scoring 20+ a game is because Kansas is so balanced and can have 5-6 guys score in double figures each game. For the record, this is the FIRST (and likely only year) that I saw picking all No. 1 seeds to reach the Final Four as a possibility. The combined record of that group, coupled with the fact the only non-No. 1 seed that I saw possibly reaching the Final Four was Tennessee made the choice easy (While I think Texas is a great team, I just didn’t feel they were as good as advertised and therefore kept them from San Antonio).

Luckily for myself, I nailed the Final Four in my pool and I’m just waiting to see if Kansas can win it all, which would net me 1st, regardless if the Jayhawks beats UCLA or Memphis.

Of course, as David’s No. 16 states, maybe I should have just asked my wife. If Memphis wins it all, she’ll finish 2nd (out of 86)!!!

@ Barbara: I had a third-round seat at the Regionals in Detroit and I can say from seeing Rush up close and talking to him after the Kansas-Davidson game, he is fine. The only reason he isn’t scoring 20+ a game is because Kansas is so balanced and can have 5-6 guys score in double figures each game.

]]>
Comment on “Sweet 16” Tips for Picking a Winning Bracket by Kathy http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2293 Kathy Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:35:22 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2293 This still hold true??? 2) Don’t pick all four #1 seeds to reach the Final Four. (This one’s for March Madness rookies.) It’s never happened, and it won’t happen this year either, with parity at an all-time high in college hoops. This still hold true???

2) Don’t pick all four #1 seeds to reach the Final Four. (This one’s for March Madness rookies.) It’s never happened, and it won’t happen this year either, with parity at an all-time high in college hoops.

]]>
Comment on “Sweet 16” Tips for Picking a Winning Bracket by Mojo http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2145 Mojo Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:09:40 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/blog/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-2145 what happened to Duke? LOL I have Memphis in my pool, and I picked Kansas to beat NC... what happened to Duke? LOL
I have Memphis in my pool, and I picked Kansas to beat NC…

]]>
Comment on Indiana Hoosiers by jeffery sandes http://www.bracketography.com/teams/indiana-hoosiers/#comment-2112 jeffery sandes Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:09:42 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/teams/indiana-hoosiers/#comment-2112 just 2 let every no iu had the chance to go to the sweet 16 with kelvin sampson but now that the dumb coach who dont know any of the plays just holds up signs dan dakcih is coachong them they might not even get past the first round indiana is my favorit team and if they dont gat their head in the game they will not go that far at all. eric gordon and dj white need to get back to the way they was playing with kelvin sampson and they might just go some where just 2 let every no iu had the chance to go to the sweet 16 with kelvin sampson but now that the dumb coach who dont know any of the plays just holds up signs dan dakcih is coachong them they might not even get past the first round

indiana is my favorit team and if they dont gat their head in the game they will not go that far at all. eric gordon and dj white need to get back to the way they was playing with kelvin sampson and they might just go some where

]]>
Comment on Kentucky Wildcats by Brian http://www.bracketography.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/#comment-2078 Brian Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:39:45 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/#comment-2078 Melissa you can't be serious. There is a reason Billy Clyde won coach of the year in the SEC. There is a reason Patrick Patterson was freshman of the year. They are great for the UK program. Patrick Patterson was the reason we went 12-4 in the SEC. Billy turned this team around, I mean after we had the home loss to Gardner Webb and San Diego, no one even thought we were going to make even the CBI, much less the NCAA's. Melissa you can’t be serious. There is a reason Billy Clyde won coach of the year in the SEC. There is a reason Patrick Patterson was freshman of the year. They are great for the UK program. Patrick Patterson was the reason we went 12-4 in the SEC. Billy turned this team around, I mean after we had the home loss to Gardner Webb and San Diego, no one even thought we were going to make even the CBI, much less the NCAA’s.

]]>
Comment on Kentucky Wildcats by Melissa http://www.bracketography.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/#comment-2068 Melissa Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:34:32 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/#comment-2068 As a long time Wildcats fan, who was sad to see Tubby go, I have to say that I hate Gillespie, and his pet Patterson. With Patterson on the sideline, I think we can go all the way. We'll be a little tired, but its what Joe and Ramel deserve! As a long time Wildcats fan, who was sad to see Tubby go, I have to say that I hate Gillespie, and his pet Patterson. With Patterson on the sideline, I think we can go all the way. We’ll be a little tired, but its what Joe and Ramel deserve!

]]>
Comment on Notre Dame Fighting Irish by tom burns http://www.bracketography.com/teams/notre-dame-fighting-irish/#comment-2062 tom burns Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:15:52 +0000 http://www.bracketography.com/teams/notre-dame-fighting-irish/#comment-2062 GO IRISH GO IRISH

]]>