<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Key Thoughts Heading into Selection Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>ya, how is that Butler 4 seed working out for Tom now????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya, how is that Butler 4 seed working out for Tom now????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>RE: Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>Hey.. how you like Butler&#039;s 7 seed??  Seems like you should leave the predicting to the experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey.. how you like Butler&#8217;s 7 seed??  Seems like you should leave the predicting to the experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swin S.</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Swin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-745</guid>
		<description>How did Baylor get In??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did Baylor get In??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philly Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Philly Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-744</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not trying to belabor the point - I have nothing against Arizona State - but it seems ridiculous to me that a team can get credit for &quot;no bad losses&quot; when they play teams between 200-300 in the RPI.  Any major conference team is going to take Florida Gulf Coast (291), Idaho (299), Cal Poly (218), and St. Francis PA (315) to the woodshed.

Va. Tech gets dinged for &quot;bad&quot; losses to Penn State (155), Old Dominion (129), and Richmond (120).  Those opponents have half the RPI of ASU&#039;s cupcakes mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to belabor the point &#8211; I have nothing against Arizona State &#8211; but it seems ridiculous to me that a team can get credit for &#8220;no bad losses&#8221; when they play teams between 200-300 in the RPI.  Any major conference team is going to take Florida Gulf Coast (291), Idaho (299), Cal Poly (218), and St. Francis PA (315) to the woodshed.</p>
<p>Va. Tech gets dinged for &#8220;bad&#8221; losses to Penn State (155), Old Dominion (129), and Richmond (120).  Those opponents have half the RPI of ASU&#8217;s cupcakes mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>At halftime of the SEC Championship Game, Georgia is leading Arkansas, 36-26.  If they are able to hang on it would be their third victory in two days and fourth since Thursday.  This from a team that won four games all season in conference play!  It is quite evident that seniors Sundiata Gaines and Dave Bliss are not going to allow their season to end without a fight.  

The likes of Ohio State, Arizona State, Virginia Tech and others are hoping that fatigue finally becomes an issue for the Bulldogs.  If not, Georgia and Dennis Felton will burst the bubble of another tournament hopeful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At halftime of the SEC Championship Game, Georgia is leading Arkansas, 36-26.  If they are able to hang on it would be their third victory in two days and fourth since Thursday.  This from a team that won four games all season in conference play!  It is quite evident that seniors Sundiata Gaines and Dave Bliss are not going to allow their season to end without a fight.  </p>
<p>The likes of Ohio State, Arizona State, Virginia Tech and others are hoping that fatigue finally becomes an issue for the Bulldogs.  If not, Georgia and Dennis Felton will burst the bubble of another tournament hopeful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: play in game</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>play in game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-742</guid>
		<description>will be Mt St MArys and Coppin State</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will be Mt St MArys and Coppin State</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximum Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximum Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>I think Butler should be a 4, USC a 5, Stanford a 4, Oregon out, Ariz. St. out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Butler should be a 4, USC a 5, Stanford a 4, Oregon out, Ariz. St. out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indigdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>indigdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Oh...by the way.  On the subject of the Last 4 In...

Creighton gets in...as the should...as one of the most deserving of all of the non-deserving middle-of-the-pack BCSer&#039;s &amp; non-BCSer&#039;s alike.  Go Big Blue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;by the way.  On the subject of the Last 4 In&#8230;</p>
<p>Creighton gets in&#8230;as the should&#8230;as one of the most deserving of all of the non-deserving middle-of-the-pack BCSer&#8217;s &amp; non-BCSer&#8217;s alike.  Go Big Blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dex</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Dex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-739</guid>
		<description>You have Vanderbilt as a 10 and A&amp;M ahead of Miami, Gonzaga, and K-State?  Are you a crazy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have Vanderbilt as a 10 and A&amp;M ahead of Miami, Gonzaga, and K-State?  Are you a crazy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/championship-week/key-thoughts-heading-into-selection-sunday/#comment-738</guid>
		<description>First off, I am a BIG Xavier guy. I have actually been thinking they should be a #2 until their last game in the Tournament, true I should not let that change my view. I just think Pittsburgh should be rewarded for their effort in the BIG EAST Tournament. So I am moving  Louisville down to a #4

Here you go:
#1&#039;s North Carolina, Memphis, UCLA, KANSAS/TEXAS winner
#2&#039;s TEXAS/KANSAS winner, Tennessee, Duke, Georgetown
#3&#039;s Wisconsin, Stanford, Xavier, Pittsburgh
#4&#039;s Louisville, Wash St., Clemson, Drake
#5&#039;s Uconn, Notre Dame, Butler, Michigan St., 
#6&#039;s Marquette, Arkansas, USC, Purdue
#7&#039;s Indiana, Temple, UNLV, Oklahoma
#8&#039;s BYU, Davidson, Texas A&amp;M, St. Joseph&#039;s
#9&#039;s Gonzaga, Kent St., Miami/FL, Kentucky
#10&#039;s St. Mary&#039;s, Kansas St, West Virginia, Vanderbilt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I am a BIG Xavier guy. I have actually been thinking they should be a #2 until their last game in the Tournament, true I should not let that change my view. I just think Pittsburgh should be rewarded for their effort in the BIG EAST Tournament. So I am moving  Louisville down to a #4</p>
<p>Here you go:<br />
#1&#8242;s North Carolina, Memphis, UCLA, KANSAS/TEXAS winner<br />
#2&#8242;s TEXAS/KANSAS winner, Tennessee, Duke, Georgetown<br />
#3&#8242;s Wisconsin, Stanford, Xavier, Pittsburgh<br />
#4&#8242;s Louisville, Wash St., Clemson, Drake<br />
#5&#8242;s Uconn, Notre Dame, Butler, Michigan St.,<br />
#6&#8242;s Marquette, Arkansas, USC, Purdue<br />
#7&#8242;s Indiana, Temple, UNLV, Oklahoma<br />
#8&#8242;s BYU, Davidson, Texas A&amp;M, St. Joseph&#8217;s<br />
#9&#8242;s Gonzaga, Kent St., Miami/FL, Kentucky<br />
#10&#8242;s St. Mary&#8217;s, Kansas St, West Virginia, Vanderbilt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
