Marquette Golden Eagles

by Andrew Force | February 17th, 2009

Good Wins: Northern Iowa, Villanova, West Virginia, @Providence
Bad Losses: @South Florida


1. Dribble Penetration. A lot of their scoring comes off penetration. Most of their scoring plays begin on the wing or the high elbow. The dribble weave made famous by Michigan State’s Tom Izzo begins most of the Eagles’ possessions. The guards take good care of the ball too, rarely spilling the pumpkin. Only West Virginia has a better turnover margin as compared to opponents.

2. Camaraderie. They love playing with each other. You can see it from the way their offense runs. Five passes at a minimum on each halfcourt set. The guards eagerly swing the ball and take equal joy in the successful shots of others. When players suffer through a coaching change they inevitably grow closer to each other. The turmoil forces this bonding upon them. It helped Dee Brown and Deron Williams at Illinois (2005) and 1989 Michigan’s Rumeal Robinson and Sean Higgins.


1. Defensive Rebounding. Small bodies and immense hearts. The Marquette seniors have battled the same demons their entire basketball careers. Other players are taller and wider. Only with sheer effort and cartoonish hops do they get any rebounds at all. Later in games they get killed on the defensive boards. Most of their rebounds come from big leaps. Late in games, their bodies tell their minds, “not this time.” The mind isn’t as eager to tell the body to take flight.

2. Stopping Penetrating Guards. The problem in the past, Edgar Sosa and Mitch Johnson (Stanford), and now is keeping quick dribblers out of the lane. Villanova exposed the weakness with Scottie Reynolds obliterating Marquette’s guards. Unable to dissuade the jets from penetrating is a curable problem, if a shot-blocker backs you up. MU has no such weapon.

Other Factors:

Bench: Hardly evident. Texan Jimmy Butler chips in 4.4 ppg and 3.7 rpg. Maurice Acker, McNeal’s high school teammate, handles the ball ok and generates a little offense when he enters. For the most part, the starting five are the whole show.

The Departing: Wesley Matthews, Jerel McNeal, Dominic James, and Dwight Burke are outgoing seniors. If David Cubillan returns he will be unfamiliar to Marquette faithful as his shooting shoulder had work done on it that would make Tommy John cringe. The three backcourt mates won’t play any harder because the end of the line is near. Their entire career has been full throttle. Emptying the tank is commonplace for the trio.

Tournament Prediction:

One and done. It’s simply a shame that the late-season NCAA junkies will never know the basketball beauty that DJ and McSteal create. These two guys will end their careers with perhaps 2 total tournament wins. And it’s a shame. Tom Crean never brought in a big man to supplement his bread and butter. With a serviceable big these guys could have been Illini ’05 or Nova ’04. They are that explosive and that enjoyable to watch.

Leave a Reply

4 Responses to “Marquette Golden Eagles”  

Subscribe to this discussion  
  1. Ben Says:

    This is probably the most pathetic, uninformed profile I have ever read. You failed to mention Matthews or Lazar Hayward and the phenomenal seasons those 2 are having. As long as this team isnt screwed by the selection committee, like they have been in the past, at minimum they will achieve a sweet 16. Have you seen this team play at all this season. Im not even a Marquette fan and respect them more than you do.

    | Comment Permalink
  2. David Mihm Says:

    Ben, I disagree completely. I’ve watched Marquette plenty this year & I would not say Hayward is having a phenomenal year. MU has been sliding lately against better competition.

    Matthews is part of the trio of guards that Andrew talks about extensively & he’s a major reason for their success to-date. But Tournament history is not on the Eagles’ side without a more reliable post presence…

    | Comment Permalink
  3. Ben Says:

    16 pts and 9 boards a game, while being a 6-5 power forward isnt phenomenal? The only reason their recent history doesn’t favor them Is what I mentioned about the selection committee. 2 years ago they were in the top 24 in RPi yet they got an 8 seed and played Michigan St. a 9.. Just cuz the selection committee was in love with the story of Crean vs Izzo. Last year the selection committee thought it would be a good idea to put the best front line in the country(Stanford) against MU. Like I said if MU doesnt get screwed by the selection committee they should be in the sweet 16 at minimum. Its funny everyone always mentions the lack of a post presense, yet their 4 loses this year are against teams that dont dont have great big men. Dayton, Tennessee, USF and Villanova. While they have beat Wisconsin, Georgetown, and Notre dame.

    Sliding against better competition? Who? one loss at Villanova?, when the Wildcats were on fire from distance all night? MU beat that same team at home handly earlier in the year. The fact is most people dont watch enough of Marquette to really understand what they do. If you watched Marquette you would not have posted what you did about Hayward. The proof is in the pudding. If Im Marquette the only 2 teams I dont want to see in the tournament are North Carolina and Oklahoma.

    | Comment Permalink
  4. Ted Says:

    I completely agree with Ben. This Marquette team could be a real contender in this year’s tournament. I also agree that Lazar Hayward is having a phenomenal year.

    | Comment Permalink

Latest Headlines

Browse By Category

Browse Archives By Author