<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Sweet 16” Tips for Picking a Winning NCAA Bracket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Muto</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Muto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t how the bracket I play works.  It is the seed number = pts for 1st round and X2 for 2nd round so Cornell was worth 36 pts if you got them to the sweet 16, Washington 33 pts, St. Mary&#039;s 30 pts and they only give 15 pts for each FF pick that is correct.  So it is far more important to get those underdog 1st/2nd round picks correct in this bracket I am playing online with 500 people.  I got mad a few years ago they actually lowered the pts for the champ, FF and Elite 8 by 5 pts per round saying &quot;every game is important&quot;.  Pretty stupid I think but such is life.  I like having upsets worth more but I think they need to up the Elite 8, FF and champion pts a lot more.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12) Don’t drive yourself crazy picking the early-round games—it’s far more important to get the Final Four correct. In a traditional bracket pool, you’ll earn the same number of points for picking two Final Four members than for predicting all of the first-round games combined. Spend most of your time analyzing who’s going to make an extended run rather than obsessing about one or two 8-9 or 5-12 matchups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t how the bracket I play works.  It is the seed number = pts for 1st round and X2 for 2nd round so Cornell was worth 36 pts if you got them to the sweet 16, Washington 33 pts, St. Mary&#8217;s 30 pts and they only give 15 pts for each FF pick that is correct.  So it is far more important to get those underdog 1st/2nd round picks correct in this bracket I am playing online with 500 people.  I got mad a few years ago they actually lowered the pts for the champ, FF and Elite 8 by 5 pts per round saying &#8220;every game is important&#8221;.  Pretty stupid I think but such is life.  I like having upsets worth more but I think they need to up the Elite 8, FF and champion pts a lot more.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
12) Don’t drive yourself crazy picking the early-round games—it’s far more important to get the Final Four correct. In a traditional bracket pool, you’ll earn the same number of points for picking two Final Four members than for predicting all of the first-round games combined. Spend most of your time analyzing who’s going to make an extended run rather than obsessing about one or two 8-9 or 5-12 matchups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>jtm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>regarding #11 - ummm  ... A&amp;M is in the south and BYU is in the west.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regarding #11 &#8211; ummm  &#8230; A&amp;M is in the south and BYU is in the west.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom williams</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>tom williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>the year is 2010   not 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the year is 2010   not 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Tell me your predictions. Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me your predictions. Please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Mackinder</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Mackinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>For the record, this is the FIRST (and likely only year) that I saw picking all No. 1 seeds to reach the Final Four as a possibility. The combined record of that group, coupled with the fact the only non-No. 1 seed that I saw possibly reaching the Final Four was Tennessee made the choice easy (While I think Texas is a great team, I just didn&#039;t feel they were as good as advertised and therefore kept them from San Antonio).

Luckily for myself, I nailed the Final Four in my pool and I&#039;m just waiting to see if Kansas can win it all, which would net me 1st, regardless if the Jayhawks beats UCLA or Memphis.

Of course, as David&#039;s No. 16 states, maybe I should have just asked my wife. If Memphis wins it all, she&#039;ll finish 2nd (out of 86)!!!

@ Barbara: I had a third-round seat at the Regionals in Detroit and I can say from seeing Rush up close and talking to him after the Kansas-Davidson game, he is fine. The only reason he isn&#039;t scoring 20+ a game is because Kansas is so balanced and can have 5-6 guys score in double figures each game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, this is the FIRST (and likely only year) that I saw picking all No. 1 seeds to reach the Final Four as a possibility. The combined record of that group, coupled with the fact the only non-No. 1 seed that I saw possibly reaching the Final Four was Tennessee made the choice easy (While I think Texas is a great team, I just didn&#8217;t feel they were as good as advertised and therefore kept them from San Antonio).</p>
<p>Luckily for myself, I nailed the Final Four in my pool and I&#8217;m just waiting to see if Kansas can win it all, which would net me 1st, regardless if the Jayhawks beats UCLA or Memphis.</p>
<p>Of course, as David&#8217;s No. 16 states, maybe I should have just asked my wife. If Memphis wins it all, she&#8217;ll finish 2nd (out of 86)!!!</p>
<p>@ Barbara: I had a third-round seat at the Regionals in Detroit and I can say from seeing Rush up close and talking to him after the Kansas-Davidson game, he is fine. The only reason he isn&#8217;t scoring 20+ a game is because Kansas is so balanced and can have 5-6 guys score in double figures each game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>This still hold true???

2) Don’t pick all four #1 seeds to reach the Final Four. (This one’s for March Madness rookies.) It’s never happened, and it won’t happen this year either, with parity at an all-time high in college hoops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This still hold true???</p>
<p>2) Don’t pick all four #1 seeds to reach the Final Four. (This one’s for March Madness rookies.) It’s never happened, and it won’t happen this year either, with parity at an all-time high in college hoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojo</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>what happened to Duke? LOL
I have Memphis in my pool, and I picked Kansas to beat NC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to Duke? LOL<br />
I have Memphis in my pool, and I picked Kansas to beat NC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Weidner</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>S Weidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Duke biffed to VCU --last year--first round.  Granted a damn exciting game--what with the OT, but for me Duke is just too arrogant.  Last year they were a 6 seed beaten by an 11.  This year arrogance may turn to humility if they are beaten by a 15.  Humility is the opposite of pride--a deadly sin..we all know,  &quot;pride goeth before the fall&quot;   The Blue Devils indeed.  Last year I did a bracket using the school mascots.  It wasn&#039;t accurate, but it was fun and informative...clicking around to all the schools I picked up a bit of the flavor of each.  This year I&#039;m letting my four year old grandson pick a bracket--he is picking a lot of upsets hummmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duke biffed to VCU &#8211;last year&#8211;first round.  Granted a damn exciting game&#8211;what with the OT, but for me Duke is just too arrogant.  Last year they were a 6 seed beaten by an 11.  This year arrogance may turn to humility if they are beaten by a 15.  Humility is the opposite of pride&#8211;a deadly sin..we all know,  &#8220;pride goeth before the fall&#8221;   The Blue Devils indeed.  Last year I did a bracket using the school mascots.  It wasn&#8217;t accurate, but it was fun and informative&#8230;clicking around to all the schools I picked up a bit of the flavor of each.  This year I&#8217;m letting my four year old grandson pick a bracket&#8211;he is picking a lot of upsets hummmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-986</guid>
		<description>4 and 8 contradict each other.  In 4, you say that Arizona has a good shot at making the Sweet 16, but then you say that Duke automatically should be put in the Sweet 16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 and 8 contradict each other.  In 4, you say that Arizona has a good shot at making the Sweet 16, but then you say that Duke automatically should be put in the Sweet 16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-bracket-tips/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/blog/%e2%80%9csweet-16%e2%80%9d-tips-for-picking-a-winning-bracket/#comment-985</guid>
		<description>Can  you tell me if brandon rush is still hurt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can  you tell me if brandon rush is still hurt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
