<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012 NCAA Tournament Bracket: Top Lines Are In Flux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s Southern Mississippi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Southern Mississippi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>No problem! My initial reaction to all those teams near the bubble is that there must have been some mistake. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem! My initial reaction to all those teams near the bubble is that there must have been some mistake. <img src='http://www.bracketography.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Very true on their quality wins. Also didn&#039;t realize that this was posted earlier in the week before they lost again. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true on their quality wins. Also didn&#8217;t realize that this was posted earlier in the week before they lost again. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>No, no mistake. They wouldn&#039;t be in today, but today is one loss later, and they were barely in last time. They may have a terrible Big Ten record, but remember that: A) non-conference play counts, and they beat went 11-2 with a win over Gonzaga while only losing to UNLV and Missouri; B) they have beaten both Ohio State and Michigan State, which is a pair of wins as good as nearly any team in the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no mistake. They wouldn&#8217;t be in today, but today is one loss later, and they were barely in last time. They may have a terrible Big Ten record, but remember that: A) non-conference play counts, and they beat went 11-2 with a win over Gonzaga while only losing to UNLV and Missouri; B) they have beaten both Ohio State and Michigan State, which is a pair of wins as good as nearly any team in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>Having Illinois in the field has to be a mistake right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having Illinois in the field has to be a mistake right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;ve changed the text. Sorry, that was originally written about Davidson, and then I forgot to change the rest once I switched it to Nevada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ve changed the text. Sorry, that was originally written about Davidson, and then I forgot to change the rest once I switched it to Nevada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ncaa-tournament-bracket-top-lines-are-in-flux/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=1391#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that Nevada and Kansas have played this year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that Nevada and Kansas have played this year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
