<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syracuse Orange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Force</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Force</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Not to pile on but Cleveland State beat Butler last season.  As the Bulldogs only lost 4 games the entire year, that marks it as impressive victory. 

CSU returned its two best players from that team, J&#039;Nathan Bullock (warrior) and Cedric Jackson (elite Mid-major combo guard).

As a college basketball fan, I am glad to see guys like Bowling Green&#039;s Louis Orr and CSU&#039;s Gary Waters (former Big East coaches) succeeding in Ohio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to pile on but Cleveland State beat Butler last season.  As the Bulldogs only lost 4 games the entire year, that marks it as impressive victory. </p>
<p>CSU returned its two best players from that team, J&#8217;Nathan Bullock (warrior) and Cedric Jackson (elite Mid-major combo guard).</p>
<p>As a college basketball fan, I am glad to see guys like Bowling Green&#8217;s Louis Orr and CSU&#8217;s Gary Waters (former Big East coaches) succeeding in Ohio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: he who must not be named</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>he who must not be named</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Mike - 
What do you think about Cleveland state now?  Still want to count that as a bad loss for syracuse?  After they embarassed Wake yesterday?  
Mihm said it already, but....not even close to a bad loss for syracuse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211;<br />
What do you think about Cleveland state now?  Still want to count that as a bad loss for syracuse?  After they embarassed Wake yesterday?<br />
Mihm said it already, but&#8230;.not even close to a bad loss for syracuse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Force</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Force</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-910</guid>
		<description>@ Otto the Orange, 

Thanks for looking so closely.  Bear in mind I wrote this March 14th (Saturday before Selection Sunday.  I expected Cuse to be a 4-5 seed at this time.  You can see the date posted underneath my name in the upper left of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Otto the Orange, </p>
<p>Thanks for looking so closely.  Bear in mind I wrote this March 14th (Saturday before Selection Sunday.  I expected Cuse to be a 4-5 seed at this time.  You can see the date posted underneath my name in the upper left of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Cleveland State?!  #52 RPI?  Automatic bid-winner?  Not even close to a &quot;bad loss.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cleveland State?!  #52 RPI?  Automatic bid-winner?  Not even close to a &#8220;bad loss.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-908</guid>
		<description>No bad losses? How about Cleveland State?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No bad losses? How about Cleveland State?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto the Orange</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/syracuse-orange/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto the Orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=999#comment-907</guid>
		<description>&quot;If NC draws the Orange in the Sweet 16, then the Tar Heels could blow them out of the building...&quot;   

- They won&#039;t meet until the Elite 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If NC draws the Orange in the Sweet 16, then the Tar Heels could blow them out of the building&#8230;&#8221;   </p>
<p>- They won&#8217;t meet until the Elite 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
