<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UCLA Bruins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/ucla-bruins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ucla-bruins/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quintin</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ucla-bruins/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Quintin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=796#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Top 100 teams dont make the tourny give me top 50 at least and who cares about the NIT this is the NCAA tourny we&#039;re talking about here. Just dont fall in love with the Pac 10 too much i dont wanna think there is a West Coast bias coming into play</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 100 teams dont make the tourny give me top 50 at least and who cares about the NIT this is the NCAA tourny we&#8217;re talking about here. Just dont fall in love with the Pac 10 too much i dont wanna think there is a West Coast bias coming into play</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ucla-bruins/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=796#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Quintin,

Every single one of UCLA&#039;s losses is within the top 100 against teams that will at the very least make the NIT.  None will be considered &quot;Bad&quot; by the Selection Committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quintin,</p>
<p>Every single one of UCLA&#8217;s losses is within the top 100 against teams that will at the very least make the NIT.  None will be considered &#8220;Bad&#8221; by the Selection Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quintin</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/ucla-bruins/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Quintin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=796#comment-872</guid>
		<description>How can a team have seven loses without one of them being bad? Losing to Michigan BAD... Losing at home to barely .500 Wash St. BAD... Being swept by AZ State who now looks like they might not make the tourny BAD. Come on lets call it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a team have seven loses without one of them being bad? Losing to Michigan BAD&#8230; Losing at home to barely .500 Wash St. BAD&#8230; Being swept by AZ State who now looks like they might not make the tourny BAD. Come on lets call it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
