<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Huskies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bracketography.com/washington-huskies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bracketography.com/washington-huskies/</link>
	<description>Just another teamrankings Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/washington-huskies/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=794#comment-871</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your email.  I am aware that Washington already played CSU.  In the interest of updating the bracket ASAP after Temple&#039;s and USC&#039;s wins, I missed that.

Also, feel free to call-in and say what you said on 1080 The Fan rather than hiding behind an anonymous comment.  I&#039;ll stand behind my projection record and also the quality of Isaac &amp; Jason&#039;s show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your email.  I am aware that Washington already played CSU.  In the interest of updating the bracket ASAP after Temple&#8217;s and USC&#8217;s wins, I missed that.</p>
<p>Also, feel free to call-in and say what you said on 1080 The Fan rather than hiding behind an anonymous comment.  I&#8217;ll stand behind my projection record and also the quality of Isaac &amp; Jason&#8217;s show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Soup For You</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/washington-huskies/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>No Soup For You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=794#comment-870</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for acknowledging your error and fixing it.   I really appreciated the email after I stuck up for your research and was embarrassed. (Not.)   I should have known better than to make assumptions based on someone hyped by those two fools on 1080.   When is the fat one going to learn English, or at least take the marbles out of his pie hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for acknowledging your error and fixing it.   I really appreciated the email after I stuck up for your research and was embarrassed. (Not.)   I should have known better than to make assumptions based on someone hyped by those two fools on 1080.   When is the fat one going to learn English, or at least take the marbles out of his pie hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Soup For You</title>
		<link>http://www.bracketography.com/washington-huskies/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>No Soup For You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bracketography.com/?p=794#comment-869</guid>
		<description>Since Washington has already played Cleveland State.  Was the rule against not playing previous opponents in the first round &quot;if possible&quot; taken into consideration?  I note Washington also play one of the other 13 seeds, Portland State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Washington has already played Cleveland State.  Was the rule against not playing previous opponents in the first round &#8220;if possible&#8221; taken into consideration?  I note Washington also play one of the other 13 seeds, Portland State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
